A non-militarist Veteran’s Day

As someone with pacifistic beliefs, Veteran’s Day presents a challenge, one that I haven’t always met gracefully. Let me try and offer some thoughts, hoping to hear your thoughts as well:

 

  • Veterans who have served honorably have earned honor from the rest of us. Some of the best men I know have served as veterans. Even if I have questions about the correctness of what they did, I have no problem honoring the motives behind what they did. And I’m also well aware that it would be foolish for me to judge from another time and place the decisions people have felt forced to make.
  • The honoring of veterans should be done by the country they served, not by the church. Veterans should be honored in church as other servants are, like teachers, first responders, medical workers, sanitation crews, etc. Celebrations beyond that belong in another arena. Let’s not dishonor the Prince of Peace by honoring war on the Lord’s Day.
  • Let’s recognize the aims of a militarized society on days such as this. Patriotic days are used to promote militarism. What’s called the American civic religion is a serious threat to the church; let’s not give it more of a foothold in our midst.
  • I distrust the use of religious language for such days. Let’s be careful with the use of the word sacrifice, for example; it carries a weight that many words do not. Another troublesome trend is the language of dying for another’s freedom; don’t let the world steal the glory from Jesus’ death on the cross. Hallowed ground… sacred… let’s remember the real meaning behind such terms and not use them in common speech.
  • Some veterans are worthy of honor; some are not. Some served honorably; some did not. Every veteran you ask will tell you the same thing. I won’t give a blanket endorsement to any group of human beings, not even church members. Let’s not confuse things by claiming that all who have served are heroes.
  • Let’s honor veterans, without glorifying them nor what they’ve done. Again, I think every veteran would say that he served in the hopes that his grandchildren wouldn’t have to. The church’s role at times like these is to be a voice for peace, not war.

OK, those are some basic thoughts. Probably made people mad on both sides. So be it. Such is my struggle with patriotic holidays. How do you resolve the struggle?

photo by Andrea Church

6 thoughts on “A non-militarist Veteran’s Day

  1. Good thoughts. Our congregation made an announcement at the end of the service thanking the veterans for their service but never did we exalt them with praise, glory, and honor since such exaltation belongs to God alone. Likewise, we did not make the focal point of our worship gathering to honor veterans since, as a church belonging to Jesus Christ, we gather to worship God, share in the communion that we have in Christ, and proclaim the word of God.

    Any ways, I share this struggle with you. I appreciate those veterans who have sought to serve their fellow humans via their service in the military. But as Christians, our life, with its freedom, hope, and peace, comes from Christ alone. It is disappointing to hear of churches who allow their worship gatherings to become more of a gathering for civic/nationalistic religion.

    Grace and Peace,

    Rex

  2. Pingback: this went thru my mind |

  3. Another troublesome trend is the language of dying for another’s freedom; don’t let the world steal the glory from Jesus’ death on the cross.

    Thanks, Laymond. I was afraid some people wouldn’t know which misused verse I was talking about.

  4. “Let’s not dishonor the Prince of Peace by honoring war on the Lord’s Day.”

    Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

    And as was written in Isaiah, he was called all those things, but denied them all every one.

    As we see when we search the scriptures the phrase “the prince of peace” appears only one time. It simply says Jesus will be refered to as the prince of peace,along with other things. But if we read the very words Jesus spoke he denies that title. as a matter of fact he said his mission was quite the opposit.
    Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
    Mat 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.